Is runners Voidable?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Liurai72
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2016
    • 1

    #1

    Is runners Voidable?

    Hi

    "MarketBook" has a property called "RunnersVoidable" and a method called "IsRunnersVoidable".
    I guess that these property and method mean that if a market has runners that does not start the tournament the bets on these runners will be void.

    I tried that method and is not working.

    On "Tennis - US Open - Mens Tournment - 2016 Mens Winner" market (https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plu...et/1.120647441), if I click on "Rules" on Web Browser , it shows this rules:

    Event Start Time
    22 August 2016, 16:00
    Win Only Market
    MARKET INFORMATION

    For further information please see Rules & Regs.

    Who will win this tournament? At the start of the first round all unmatched bets will be cancelled and the market re-opened, the market will then be turned in-play with unmatched bets cancelled at the start of the final. This market will not be actively managed therefore it is the responsibility of all users to manage their positions.

    If a player does not start a tournament then all bets on that player will be void.

    Any player starting a tournament but withdrawing or being disqualified before the end of the tournament will be settled as a loser.

    Customers should be aware that:

    Transmissions described as “live” by some broadcasters may actually be delayed and that all in-play matches are not necessarily televised.

    The extent of any such delay may vary, depending on the set-up through which they are receiving pictures or data.


    UK wallet
    Commission on this market
    7% Market Base Rate (minus your discount)
    Your Discount Rate explained

    But when I check "IsRunnersVoidable" property of "MarketBook", this will be "False" when it should ber "True".

    Can anyone help me?

    I need to check if a market when a runner is removed, the bets on that runner will be void or not.
  • jabe
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2014
    • 705

    #2
    I think you ought to refer it to support.

    Comment

    Working...
    X